Digital technology-assisted STEM education shows a significantly larger effect on science achievement (d=2.838) than on mathematics achievement (d=1.255)¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesisr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Effect sizes differ significantly by subject discipline of the achievement test (QB=11.776, p<0.05), with science larger than mathematics. → Feyyaz Öztop 2023
Evidence¶
Feyyaz Öztop 2023¶
Feyyaz Öztop. (2023). A Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Digital Technology-Assisted STEM Education. Journal of Science Learning. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v6i2.52316
q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2
Moderator analysis by subject discipline of the achievement test, reported in Table 5 with 32 science and 6 mathematics comparisons. The between-groups test was significant (QB=11.776, p<0.05); the science effect size exceeded the mathematics effect size.
"As seen in Table 5, the effect sizes were d=2.838 for science and d=1.255 for mathematics. As can be seen, the effect size of the science achievement test is larger than that of the mathematics achievement test. The analysis showed a statistically significant difference between the effect sizes (QB=11.776, p<0.05)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The effect of the 7E learning cycle on achievement differs significantly by subject matter, with the largest average for chemistry and the smallest for science — related
- Lesson subject significantly moderates the effect of constructivism on attitudes: positive for science and technology and other subjects, not significant for mathematics — related
- Science-related subject areas (mathematics, science, medical science) show larger effects than programming technology and other fields — reports the opposite
- Discipline significantly moderates the effects of educational robotics on STEM learning, with larger effects in technology and cross-disciplinary contexts than in science and mathematics — related
- Differences in AI-supported instruction effects across STEM disciplines are not statistically significant — reports the opposite
- Relational-understanding technologies show the most divergent effects (.09 to 1.02), moderated by grade level, duration, and mathematics subject matter — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.