Claims

Left STG developmental activation change interacts with baseline age: younger children peak at session 2, older children show more activation at session 3

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associational r1–r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Mixed regression revealed a significant session × baseline age interaction in the left STG cluster, with opposite session 2 vs 3 patterns for younger vs older children. → Romanovska 2022 (2)

Evidence

Romanovska 2022

Romanovska, L., Janssen, R. & Bonte, M. (2022). Longitudinal changes in cortical responses to letter-speech sound stimuli in 8–11 year-old children. npj Science of Learning 7:2. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-021-00118-3

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Post-hoc mixed regression on individual beta values from the longitudinal sample, with session, baseline age, reading fluency, recalibration effect and pre-test slope as within-subject covariates. The session × baseline age interaction was significant (F(2,13) = 8.702, p < 0.005).

"younger children showed higher left STG activation during session 2 compared to session 3 (mean difference = 0.596, t(11) = 2.950, p < 0.05), whereas older children showed more STG activation in session 3 compared to session 2 (mean difference = 0.502, t(10) = 2.918, p < 0.05)."

Romanovska 2022 (2)

Romanovska, L., Janssen, R. & Bonte, M. (2022). Longitudinal changes in cortical responses to letter-speech sound stimuli in 8–11 year-old children. npj Science of Learning 7:2. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-021-00118-3

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Same mixed regression models: both the session × baseline age and session × recalibration effect interactions were significant in the left STG cluster only, with no significant interactions in the lateral inferior pre-CG.

"The analyses showed signi ficant interactions between session and children ’s baseline age [ F(2,13) = 8.702, p < 0.005] and between session and the recalibration effect [ F(2,17) = 5.808, p < 0.05] in the left STG cluster."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id stg-activation-age-interaction
title Left STG developmental activation change interacts with baseline age: younger children peak at session 2, older children show more activation at session 3
description Left STG developmental activation change interacts with baseline age: younger children peak at session 2, older children show more activation at session 3
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2022
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-27
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — romanovska-2022, romanovska-2022-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.