Non-decision time (encoding/motor speed) is unchanged when inhibitory demands are introduced¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3·i0negligible
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i0 Non-decision time was equivalent during the stop-signal and no-tone tasks (BF01 = 5.73; d = 0.07), with no group main effect or interaction. → Fosco 2019
Evidence¶
Fosco 2019¶
Fosco, W. D., Kofler, M. J., Alderson, R. M., Tarle, S. J., Raiker, J. S., & Sarver, D. E. (2019). Inhibitory Control and Information Processing in ADHD: Comparing the Dual Task and Performance Adjustment Hypotheses. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-018-0504-9
q3 · i0 · causal · r2
Tier 2 Bayesian mixed ANOVA of drift-diffusion parameters in 144 children. "non-decision time was equivalent during the stop-signal and no-tone tasks" (d = 0.07), inconsistent with the dual-task hypothesis prediction of disrupted stimulus encoding and response execution.
"There was moderate evidence that non-decision time was equivalent during the stop-signal and no-tone tasks (BF01 = 5.73; d = 0.07). There was also significant evidence against a main effect of group on non-decision time (BF01 = 5.43; d = 0.01), and against the group x task interaction (BF01 = 4.30)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Children with and without ADHD show equivalent increases in response caution when stop trials are introduced — related
- Children adopt a more cautious response strategy (higher boundary separation) when intermittent stop trials are introduced — related
- Introducing intermittent stop trials does not change processing speed (drift rate) in children with or without ADHD — related
- Equivalent performance-adjustment effects hold when clinical control and neurotypical children are analyzed separately — related
- Go-trial response times are slower during the stop-signal task than the no-tone task, with no diagnostic group difference — related
- Reward does not alter the speed or variability of response execution in either stop signal task — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
stop-signal-demands-no-nondecision-time-change |
title |
Non-decision time (encoding/motor speed) is unchanged when inhibitory demands are introduced |
description |
Non-decision time (encoding/motor speed) is unchanged when inhibitory demands are introduced |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2019 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — fosco-2019 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.