Equivalent performance-adjustment effects hold when clinical control and neurotypical children are analyzed separately¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? Three-group Bayesian ANOVAs found significant evidence against group x task interactions for boundary separation (BF01 = 7.98), drift rate (BF01 = 8.81), and non-decision time (BF01 = 11.35). → Fosco 2019

Evidence¶

Fosco 2019¶

Fosco, W. D., Kofler, M. J., Alderson, R. M., Tarle, S. J., Raiker, J. S., & Sarver, D. E. (2019). Inhibitory Control and Information Processing in ADHD: Comparing the Dual Task and Performance Adjustment Hypotheses. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-018-0504-9

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Exploratory Tier 3 analyses separated the Non-ADHD group into neurotypical (n=34) and clinical control (n=29) subsamples. "significant evidence against a group x task interaction" for all three diffusion parameters indicates the ADHD, clinical control, and neurotypical groups equivalently used the slowing strategy.

"there was also significant evidence against a group x task interaction for boundary separation (BF01 = 7.98), drift rate (BF01 = 8.81), and non-decision time (BF01 = 11.35); there was no significant evidence of a group x task interaction for MRT (BF10 = 1.26)."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Children with and without ADHD show equivalent increases in response caution when stop trials are introduced — related
• Children adopt a more cautious response strategy (higher boundary separation) when intermittent stop trials are introduced — related
• Introducing intermittent stop trials does not change processing speed (drift rate) in children with or without ADHD — related
• Non-decision time (encoding/motor speed) is unchanged when inhibitory demands are introduced — related
• A meta-analysis found no evidence that clinical status, including ADHD and substance use disorder samples, moderates the effect of reward on inhibitory control — related
• Go-trial response times are slower during the stop-signal task than the no-tone task, with no diagnostic group difference — related