Claims

Reading strategies training also improves inferential reading comprehension of elementary-proficiency EFL vocational students

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · checked against its sources 2026-11-02 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The experimental group significantly outperformed the control group on inferential comprehension (ANCOVA F = 11.37, p = .001). → Mistar et al. 2016

Evidence

Mistar et al. 2016

Junaidi Mistar, Alfan Zuhairi & Nofita Yanti. (2016). Strategies Training in the Teaching of Reading Comprehension for EFL Learners in Indonesia. English Language Teaching, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n2p49

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Same quasi-experiment (N=71, ANCOVA with mid-semester covariate). Inferential comprehension post-test means were 62.92 (experimental) vs 56.71 (control); the treatment effect was significant with "an F-value 11.37 (p<.001)".

"Meanwhile, an F-value 11.37 (p<.001) was obtained in the comparison between the experimental group and the control group in terms of their inferential comprehension."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.