Claims

Training Saudi EFL college students in the 3-2-1 reading strategy for six weeks significantly improves their reading comprehension compared with no strategy training

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2011 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i3 After six weeks of instruction, EFL students trained in the 3-2-1 strategy achieved significantly higher reading comprehension post-test scores than untrained controls, with the strategy explaining 61% of variance in scores. → Alsamadani 2011

Evidence

Alsamadani 2011

Hashem Ahmed Alsamadani. (2011). The Effects of the 3-2-1 Reading Strategy on EFL Reading Comprehension. English Language Teaching, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v4n3p184

q3 · i3 · causal · r2

Quasi-experiment with 85 low-intermediate Saudi EFL students (42 experimental, 43 control), matched on proficiency and taught by the same teacher; pre-test scores used as covariate. The ANCOVA showed a "significant difference between the mean scores of the two groups" with η² = .61 (partial eta squared = .61), a large printed effect size.

"The results of the ANCOVA (as shown in table 2) show that there was a significant difference between the mean scores of the two groups on post-reading test scores, F (1, 82) = 130.4, p = .000, partial eta squared = .61."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.