Strategy guidance yields better delayed recall performance and higher delayed-recall efficiency than continuous presentation¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? Compared to the continuous presentation group, the strategy guidance group showed better performance in the delayed recall test and higher performance efficiency in the delayed recall test. → Lin 2022

Evidence¶

Lin 2022¶

Lin, YC., Liu, TC. & Kalyuga, S. (2022). Strategies for facilitating processing of transient information in instructional videos by using learner control mechanisms. Instructional Science, 50, 863–877. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-022-09600-w

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Delayed posttest from the same between-subjects experiment with 90 undergraduates. The strategy guidance group outperformed the continuous presentation group on delayed recall performance and delayed-recall performance efficiency. No effect sizes are printed in the available text.

"as well as better performance in the delayed recall test and higher performance efficiency in the delayed recall test."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Strategy guidance in using pause and scrollbar controls yields better immediate comprehension and higher performance efficiency than unguided learner control
• Providing strategy guidance leads learners to pause and scroll back on the video timeline more often than unguided learner control
• Guided use of a multiple document reading application yields higher multiple document comprehension than access-only, unguided, or traditional pdf viewer use — related
• Strategy guidance yields better immediate recall and comprehension and higher efficiency than continuous presentation without learner control — related