Claims

Perceived reading strategy use positively affected reading comprehension among Grade 11 ESL learners

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The study reports that strategy use positively affected reading comprehension. → Cekiso 2012

Evidence

Cekiso 2012

Cekiso, M. (2012). Effects of strategy instruction on the reading comprehension and strategy awareness of Grade 11 English Second Language learners in the Eastern Cape. Reading & Writing 3(1), Art. #23. https://doi.org/10.4102/rw.v3i1.23

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Author's conclusion drawn from the quasi-experiment comparing strategy-use frequencies and comprehension scores across the experimental and control groups; the article prints no correlation coefficient or effect size for this relationship, so the stated association is reported without a statistic.

"As for the relationship between perceived strategy use and reading comprehension, this study revealed that strategy use did positively affect reading comprehension"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.