Claims

Grade 11 ESL learners who received explicit reading strategy instruction achieved statistically and practically significantly higher reading comprehension scores than control-group learners

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2012 · checked against its sources 2026-11-02 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Experimental-group learners scored statistically significantly (p < 0.05) higher on the reading comprehension post-test than control-group learners. → Cekiso 2012

Evidence

Cekiso 2012

Cekiso, M. (2012). Effects of strategy instruction on the reading comprehension and strategy awareness of Grade 11 English Second Language learners in the Eastern Cape. Reading & Writing 3(1), Art. #23. https://doi.org/10.4102/rw.v3i1.23

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Quasi-experimental pre-test/post-test control group study of 60 Grade 11 Xhosa-speaking ESL learners in one East London high school, with intact classes randomly assigned (N = 30 each). The article reports a statistically significant post-test difference (p < 0.05) favouring the experimental group; Table 3 also prints a practical significance d-value of 0.56 for this contrast.

"An analysis of the post-test reading comprehension scores of Grade 11 ESL learners in the experimental and control groups indicated that learners in the experimental group achieved statistically significantly (p < 0.05) higher mean scores on the reading comprehension test"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.