Claims

Stratified teaching has a larger effect in medium-size classes (SMD = 0.64) than in large classes (SMD = 0.44)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The between-group test reached significance (QBET = 4.727, P = 0.030), with the medium-size class effect size (0.64) exceeding the large-size class effect size (0.44). → Shi 2020

Evidence

Shi 2020

Shi, H., Cheung, E.S.T., & Cheung, A.C.K. (2020) The impact of stratified teaching on the academic performance of Chinese middle school students: A meta-analysis. Science Insights Education Frontiers, 7(1):735-760. https://doi.org/10.15354/sief.20.re012

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Class-size moderator analysis of the included studies (Table 4): 15 large-class and 11 medium-class datasets, combined test Z = 11.712, P = 0.000. No small-class studies met the inclusion criteria, so medium versus small could not be compared.

"the student effect size of the large size class is 0.44, the student effect size of the medium size class is 0.64, SMD medium size > SMD large size, indicating that stratified teaching has a more significant impact on the academic performance of students in middle-size classes than students in large-size classes."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.