Claims

Flipped classroom shows significant positive effects across class sizes, with the largest reported effect for medium-sized classes

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2021 · checked against its sources 2026-10-31 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i2 Effects were positive and significant for small, medium, and large classes (Z = 9.344, p = 0.000), with no significant between-group difference (QBET = 3.286, p = 0.193); the text reports the medium-sized effect as largest (SMD = 0.81). → Zhang 2021

Evidence

Zhang 2021

Zhang, Q., Cheung, E.S.T., & Cheung, C.S.T. (2021). The impact of flipped classroom on college students’ academic performance: A meta-analysis based on 20 experimental studies. Science Insights Education Frontiers, 8(2):1059-1080. https://doi.org/10.15354/sief.21.re019

q3 · i2 · quant-synthesis · r2

Moderator analysis of class size (Table 4) across the included studies. The article's text reports printed effect sizes of SMD = 0.52 (small), SMD = 0.66 (large), and SMD = 0.81 (medium) as most affected; Table 4 itself lists Small = 0.81 and Medium = 0.52, an internal inconsistency in the article.

"the combined effect size of small-sized classes (SMD = 0.52), the combined effect size of large-sized classes (SMD = 0.66), and the co m-bined effect size of medium-sized classes (SMD = 0.81)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.