Claims

Stress-resilience dissociations were identified, with high distress coexisting alongside moderate-to-high resilience

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2031: baselines and conditions change

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Several studies found resilience and psychological distress were not inversely exclusive: high distress coexisted with moderate-to-high resilience. → Zhandire 2026

Evidence

Zhandire 2026

Zhandire, T. T., Bakare-Fatungase, O. D., & Mkhize, N. (2026). Mental health, resilience, and academic outcomes among university students: a global scoping review with particular attention to African and Global South contexts. BMC Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-026-05242-6

q2 · i? · review · r2

The review's thematic synthesis (RQ3) on the mental health–resilience relationship reports that "Several identified stress-resilience dissociations, that is, high distress coexisting with moderate-high resilience"; no effect sizes are printed.

"Thirty-eight studies reported higher resilience associated with better mental health. Several identified stress-resilience dissociations, that is, high distress coexisting with moderate-high resilience."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.