Claims

Earlier research on writing-support technology centred on Automated Writing Evaluation, Automated Essay Scoring and rarer Intelligent Tutoring Systems, mainly for US secondary school essay writing

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r? · q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Previous studies in this field centred on Automated Writing Evaluation, Automated Essay Scoring and the rarer Intelligent Tutoring Systems, addressing mainly essay writing needs in US secondary school instruction. → Strobl 2019

Evidence

Strobl 2019

Strobl, Carola; Ailhaud, Emilie; Benetos, Kalliopi; Devitt, Ann; Kruse, Otto. (2019). Digital support for academic writing : a review of technologies and pedagogies. Computers & Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.12.005

q2 · i? · review · r?

The review's characterisation of the prior literature: earlier work focused on "Automated Writing Evaluation, Automated Essay Scoring and the rarer Intelligent Tutoring Systems" for US secondary school essay writing.

"Previous studies in this field centred on Automated Writing Evaluation, Automated Essay Scoring and the rarer Intelligent Tutoring Systems, addressing mainly essay writing needs in US secondary school instruction."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-30
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.