Strong acquisition tasks explicating the organization produce better internalization than weak tasks asking only for a structured summary¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 1979 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Evidence quality · No study behind this claim is a peer-reviewed article with a DOI: it rests on an ERIC document (a report, conference paper or thesis). It is kept because 3 design pages cite it; treat it as a lead to check, not an established finding.
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Subjects in strong treatments, whose acquisition tasks included marking organizational charts and arranging items into a chart, significantly outperformed weak-treatment subjects who wrote a structured summary. → Eylon 1979
Evidence¶
Eylon 1979¶
Eylon, Bat-Sheva; Reif, F. (1979). Effects of Internal Knowledge Organization on Task Performance. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED171804
q2 · i? · no effect size printed; the entry gives only the ANOVA test, F(1,12) = 5.96, p < 0.05 · causal · r2
Experiment 2 two-way ANOVA (input version x acquisition tasks) on the sum of composite scores of all type-a and type-b tasks showed a significant acquisition-task effect [F(1,12)=5.96, p<0.05], despite all subjects studying the same well-organized materials for equal time.
"showed explicitly that the differentacquisition tasks had significant effects (F(1,12) = 5.96, p < 0.05),"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
-
Training in text structure improves college students' summaries, but summarizing has not been shown here to improve recall or writing more than rereading or other active reading — the general claim this finding bears on, with the studies behind it
-
Advance organizers produce a small average learning benefit, larger for high-ability than for low-ability learners — the general claim this finding bears on, with the studies behind it
- A hierarchical internal knowledge organization facilitates performance on complex recall and problem-solving tasks more than a single-level organization of the same knowledge — related
- A hierarchical organization facilitates tasks only when matched to the task domain: organization A aids deductive tasks and organization B aids historical tasks — related
- Initial retrieval conditions that provide less cue support, such as free recall rather than recognition or fewer letter cues, tend to produce better retention despite lower initial success — related
- Learner highlighting of text gives a small memory benefit but no reliable comprehension benefit, and evidence on other forms of annotation is not yet recorded here — related
- Guided Notes Improve Note Accuracy — related
- Structural signals show no consistent recall benefits but can aid deeper understanding measured by problem-solving tests — related
- Information at higher levels of an acquired hierarchical organization is recalled better than information at lower levels — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
strong-acquisition-tasks-improve-internalization |
title |
Strong acquisition tasks explicating the organization produce better internalization than weak tasks asking only for a structured summary |
description |
Strong acquisition tasks explicating the organization produce better internalization than weak tasks asking only for a structured summary |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
1979 |
generated |
by claude/unspecified on 2026-09-25 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — eylon-1979 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.