Most considered student characteristics (gender, effort, interest, extrinsic motivation, self-efficacy, perceived autonomy) showed no reported moderation of intervention effects¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Of the seven considered student characteristics, only prior grades emerged as a reported moderator. → Flunger 2019
Evidence¶
Flunger 2019¶
Flunger, B., Mayer, A., & Umbach, N. (2019). Beneficial for Some or for Everyone? Exploring the Effects of an Autonomy-Supportive Intervention in the Real-Life Classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 111, no. 2, pp. 210-234. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000284
q3 · i? · causal · r2
The randomized study tested conditional effects for each of these "potential moderators" via the EffecLiteR approach. Only prior grades were reported as moderating, implying the other listed characteristics did not yield reported moderation; no statistics are printed for the null interactions.
"A range of student characteristics (gender, prior physics grades, physics-related effort, interest, extrinsic motivation, self-efficacy, and perceived autonomy in physics class) were considered as potential moderators."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Students' prior physics grades moderated the intervention's effects on three outcomes, with higher-grade students reporting greater optional choices, joy, and effort — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- Prior knowledge and intervention condition predict repeated cognitive load and interest measures: prior knowledge lowers effort and difficulty and raises interest and understanding, and prompting groups perceive tasks as more difficult — related
- Learners invest more effort in tasks they perceive as interesting, personally important, or useful to their future goals. — related
- Math self-concept is a stronger predictor of math achievement, whereas value beliefs are stronger predictors of self-reported effort — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
student-characteristics-mostly-no-moderation-autonomy-support |
title |
Most considered student characteristics (gender, effort, interest, extrinsic motivation, self-efficacy, perceived autonomy) showed no reported moderation of intervention effects |
description |
Most considered student characteristics (gender, effort, interest, extrinsic motivation, self-efficacy, perceived autonomy) showed no reported moderation of intervention effects |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2019 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-25 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — flunger-2019 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.