Claims

Teachers rated fostering student engagement as the most difficult DL teaching practice, below class management and teaching strategies

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2028: baselines and conditions change

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Descriptive means showed class management rated highest, teaching strategies second, and student engagement lowest among DL teaching practice sub-dimensions. → Vidergor Hava E 2023

Evidence

Vidergor Hava E 2023

Vidergor Hava E. (2023). The effect of teachers' self- innovativeness on accountability, distance learning self-efficacy, and teaching practices. Computers & Education, 199, 104777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104777

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Descriptive statistics of the research dimensions (Table 2, N = 200) show the DL teaching practice sub-dimension student engagement had the lowest mean, consistent with the authors' observation that teachers were "much less able to foster student engagement during synchronous or asynchronous DL teaching".

"Challenges in DL teaching practices are also indicated by the results showing teachers mostly perceive themselves as able to manage their classroom, then in second place use different DL teaching strategies, and much less able to foster student engagement during synchronous or asynchronous DL teaching."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-29
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.