Claims

Teacher candidates expressed mostly positive opinions of place-based lessons, citing retention of information most often, with time and cost as main drawbacks

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Experimental group students gave 55 positive and 40 negative opinions; the most common positive opinion was that the approach increases retention of information (17 responses), and the most common negative was problem of time (11 responses). → Yılmaz 2019

Evidence

Yılmaz 2019

Nihal Yıldız Yılmaz. (2019). Examining the Effects of Geography Lessons Taught with Place Based Teaching to Science Process Skills for Classroom Teacher Candidates. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v7i2.3693

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Content analysis of a semi-structured interview form with the experimental group (case-study qualitative phase). Positive themes included "increases the retention of information" (17), on-site learning (15) and interest (8); negative themes were time (11) and cost (9).

"it is determined that the students in the experimental group expressed 55 positive and 40 negative opinions for the lessons with the place based teaching."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.