Claims

Students expressed positive opinions about the SQ3R intervention, while reporting that summarizing was difficult

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In focus group interviews, students said the SQ3R strategy contributed to their reading comprehension, though they struggled with summarizing texts. → Bulut 2017

Evidence

Bulut 2017

Aydın Bulut. (2017). Improving 4th Grade Primary School Students' Reading Comprehension Skills. Universal Journal of Educational Research 5(1): 23-30. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.050103

q2 · i? · design · r2

Video-recorded focus group interviews at the end of the intervention. Students likened working with keywords and predictions to "a game of mystery"; İlknur said "I liked working with keywords because with this exercise I could understand the texts."

"However, at the end, t hey stated that the SQ3R strategy had c ontributed to their reading comprehension process."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.