Claims

Student tutors show greater role congruence, being more interested in students' daily lives and study experiences

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 1995 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Student tutors were rated as more interested in students' daily lives, study experiences and personalities, with significant and relatively large differences in both courses. → Moust 1995

Evidence

Moust 1995

Moust, J. C. & Schmidt, H. G. (1995). Facilitating small-group learning: a comparison of student and staff tutors' behavior. Instructional Science 22: 287-301. https://link.springer.com/journal/11251

q3 · i? · associational · r2

Role congruence ratings favored student tutors in both courses (course 1: F = 23.34, p = 0.001; course 2: F = 40.67, p = 0.001); interviews describe student tutors sharing their own learning routes and showing involvement.

"Student tutors were more interested in students' daily lives, study experiences and personalities. All differences were significant and relatively large."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id student-tutors-greater-role-congruence
title Student tutors show greater role congruence, being more interested in students' daily lives and study experiences
description Student tutors show greater role congruence, being more interested in students' daily lives and study experiences
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 1995
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — moust-1995

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.