The tribute reports students tend to overestimate their sport performance, and four-level model instruction may improve calibration accuracy¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · theoreticalr2·q1
Currency · newest study 2025 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q1 i? Research findings reportedly suggest students tend to overestimate their sport performance, with potential detrimental effects on learning, while learning sport skills through the four-level instructional model may help enhance calibration accuracy. → Kitsantas 2025
Evidence¶
Kitsantas 2025¶
Kitsantas, A., Bembenutty, H., Cleary, T. J., Alexander, P. A., DiBenedetto, M. K., Kaplan, A., Kolovelonis, A., Mandell, B. E., Martin, A. J., McCrudden, M. T., Panadero, E., Salisbury-Glennon, J. D., & Schunk, D. H. (2025). Barry J. Zimmerman's Enduring Legacy: The Inspiring Fusion of Self-Regulated Learning Theory, Practice, and Mentorship. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10052-0
q1 · i? · theoretical · r2
A tribute commentary (Kolovelonis) reports his calibration research findings, citing Kolovelonis and Goudas (2019), that "students tend to overestimate their sport performance." He further reports that learning through the four-level instructional model may help students enhance calibration accuracy (Kolovelonis et al., 2022). No statistics are printed in the tribute.
"research findings suggested that students tend to overestimate their sport performance (Kolovelonis & Goudas, 2019), with potential detrimental effects on their learning"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Self Assessment Accuracy Is Low Without Training — a broader claim this one bears on
- In one 2×2 experiment with 120 undergraduates, an Assessment-Performance Calibration Activity (APCA) gave the most accurate self-assessment and least overconfidence, and adding a feedback-literacy script did not improve calibration further — a broader claim this one bears on
- No trace format supported calibrated self-evaluation: perceived-achieved correlations were low and non-significant in all conditions — related
- A theoretical article, citing two simulation studies, reports that novice clinical learners overestimated their performance and that their confidence exceeded their accuracy — related
- The tribute reports that process and transitional goals could outperform outcome goals in dart-throwing practice — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
students-overestimate-sport-performance-calibration |
title |
The tribute reports students tend to overestimate their sport performance, and four-level model instruction may improve calibration accuracy |
description |
The tribute reports students tend to overestimate their sport performance, and four-level model instruction may improve calibration accuracy |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2025 |
source_checked |
2026-10-20 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — kitsantas-2025 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.