Most Omani EFL students report receiving and preferring direct written corrective feedback over indirect¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q1
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q1 i? 48% of students reported usually receiving direct WCF, and 68% reported finding direct WCF effective for them, while only 28% found indirect WCF effective. → Ahmed Ali Saleh Al Ajmi 2015
Evidence¶
Ahmed Ali Saleh Al Ajmi 2015¶
Ahmed Ali Saleh Al Ajmi. (2015). The Effect of Written Corrective Feedback on Omani Students’ Accuracy in the Use of English Prepositions. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.6n.1p.61
q1 · i? · causal · r1
Open-ended questionnaire administered to all 25 experimental-group students after the delayed post-test, analysed thematically. The article also reports 48% usually receive direct WCF and "only 24% of the students reported that they only receive indirect WCF".
"Regarding the students’ views about which type of WCF is effective for them, 68% of the respondents reported that they find direct WCF effective for them."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Students overwhelmingly prefer focused written corrective feedback targeting specific errors at a time — related
- Most students judge written corrective feedback alone insufficient and want accompanying metalinguistic explanation — related
- Learners prefer receiving corrective feedback more than teachers feel they should provide it — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.