Claims

Most Omani EFL students report receiving and preferring direct written corrective feedback over indirect

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q1
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? 48% of students reported usually receiving direct WCF, and 68% reported finding direct WCF effective for them, while only 28% found indirect WCF effective. → Ahmed Ali Saleh Al Ajmi 2015

Evidence

Ahmed Ali Saleh Al Ajmi 2015

Ahmed Ali Saleh Al Ajmi. (2015). The Effect of Written Corrective Feedback on Omani Students’ Accuracy in the Use of English Prepositions. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.6n.1p.61

q1 · i? · causal · r1

Open-ended questionnaire administered to all 25 experimental-group students after the delayed post-test, analysed thematically. The article also reports 48% usually receive direct WCF and "only 24% of the students reported that they only receive indirect WCF".

"Regarding the students’ views about which type of WCF is effective for them, 68% of the respondents reported that they find direct WCF effective for them."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.