Claims

About 80% of multimedia-group students preferred multimedia over classical lectures, citing animation and step-by-step visualization

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Among Architecture multimedia students, 82% (22 students) preferred multimedia and 12% (3 students) classical; among CCM students, 80% (20) preferred multimedia and 20% (5) classical. → Marina Milovanoviü 2013

Evidence

Marina Milovanoviü 2013

Marina Milovanoviü, Jasmina Obradoviü, Aleksandar Milajiü. (2013). APPLICATION OF INTERACTIVE MULTIMEDIA TOOLS IN TEACHING MATHEMATICS – EXAMPLES OF LESSONS FROM GEOMETRY. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 12(1). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1008863

q2 · i? · causal · r2

End-of-research survey of the two multimedia groups (25 students each). Students explained preferences with reasons such as "Picture is essential for understanding geometry, and it is even better with animation and movements in 3-D space" and easier comprehension via step-by-step animation.

"in group of Architecture students 12% (3 students) answered classical and 82% (22 students) answered multimedia, and in group Civil Construction Management students of 20 % (5 students) answered classical and 80 % (20 students) answered multimedia"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.