Students overwhelmingly reported that animation use positively affected their grammar success, citing permanence, repetition, understanding, interest and participation¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? In response to the open-ended question about whether animation affected their success, 29 of 30 students (97%) answered positively and one (3%) negatively. → Özcan and Kiliç 2017
Evidence¶
Özcan and Kiliç 2017¶
Mehmet Fatih Özcan, Latife Kirbaşoğlu Kiliç. (2017). The Effects of Animation Supported 5E Model on Teaching 'Indicative and Subjunctive Moods' in 7th Grade Turkish Lesson. Universal Journal of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.051407
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Content analysis of student interview responses in the experimental group to the question "Did using animation in grammar topics affect your success? Why?". Positive themes included permanence, repetition, understanding, imagination, interest, attention and participation; one student reported distraction from the computer.
"29 of the students stated that the animation use affected their success positively and one of the students stated it affected negatively. That 97% of the students stated positively can be interpreted that the animation enables learning to be permanent and repeatable"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Animation-supported 5E instruction produced significantly higher post-test grammar success than the current teaching programme in 7th grade Turkish — related
- GPT4-coded sentiment of students' open-ended general feedback about the intervention was overwhelmingly positive — related
- 90% of open-ended survey responses about the ChatGPT activity were neutral in sentiment, with 2% positive and 8% negative — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.