Claims

Animation-supported 5E instruction produced significantly higher post-test grammar success than the current teaching programme in 7th grade Turkish

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? After the six-week implementation, the experimental group taught with animation-supported 5E scored significantly higher on the grammar success test than the control group taught with direct instruction and question-answer methods. → Özcan and Kiliç 2017

Evidence

Özcan and Kiliç 2017

Mehmet Fatih Özcan, Latife Kirbaşoğlu Kiliç. (2017). The Effects of Animation Supported 5E Model on Teaching 'Indicative and Subjunctive Moods' in 7th Grade Turkish Lesson. Universal Journal of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.051407

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Quasi-experimental t-test comparison of post-test scores between the experimental group (animation-supported 5E) and control group (current programme), each with 25 analysed students per the printed table. The article reports "a significant difference between the levels of the value of winning" with t(48)=2.223, p=.007; no effect size is printed.

"T48=.2.223 and P=,007 p<0.05 for significance, it is observed that significant level. After the application of this finding experimental and control groups indicate that there is a significant difference between the levels of the value of winning."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.