Claims

Students reported that communication technologies made the unit's topics more understandable and supported knowledge retention, with some reporting behavior change

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q1
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? Almost all interviewed participants reported the communication technologies used in the unit made the subject understandable, and several reported gains in information, retention, and behavior change. → Egüz 2019

Evidence

Egüz 2019

Egüz, Ş., Öztürk, C. & Kesten, A. (2019). Technology-supported global education: A mixed method study. Pegem Eğitim ve Öğretim Dergisi, 9(4), 1209-1244. http://dx.doi.org/10.14527/pegegog.2019.040

q1 · i? · causal · r2

Descriptive analysis of the same 10-student interviews (Table 10): categories included getting information, knowledge retention, expansion of the subject, understanding of the subject, repeating the subject, and causing behavior change. Participant 10 said "I can understand better when I watch a video or read a newspaper article".

"almost all of the participants reported that the communication technologies used in the unit made the subject understandable"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.