Learning efficiency increases with age, with adults and 14-year-olds more efficient than 10-year-olds, and no age-by-condition interaction¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Efficiency showed a main effect of age group: adults and 14-year-olds each exceeded 10-year-olds, but adults did not differ from 14-year-olds; the age group by condition interaction was not significant. → Gönül 2021
Evidence¶
Gönül 2021¶
Gönül, G., Tsalas, N., Paulus, M. (2021). The effect of time pressure on metacognitive control: developmental changes in self-regulation and efficiency during learning. Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-021-09262-y
q3 · i? · causal · r2
GLMM on efficiency from the study time allocation experiment. The best-fit model also included a nonsignificant age group by condition interaction, F(2, 722) = 1.982, p = 0.139, suggesting time pressure affected efficiency similarly in all age groups.
"There was a significant main effect of age group, F(2, 722) = 10.147, p < 0.001. Adults had significantly higher return rate than 10-year olds, t(722) = 4.055, p < 0.001, but not than 14-year olds, p = 0.120. However, 14-year olds had significantly higher return rate than 10-year olds, t(722) = 2.847, p = 0.009."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Recall is higher in untimed than timed conditions and for easy than difficult items, with a three-way age-by-condition-by-difficulty interaction driven by adults outperforming 10-year-olds on timed difficult items — related
- Self-regulation of study time increases with age: adults exceed 14-year-olds, who exceed 10-year-olds, though self-regulation is already established at age 10 — related
- Judgments of learning are higher for easy than difficult items at all ages and increase with age, confirming the difficulty manipulation aligned with subjective difficulty — related
- Mild time pressure increases learning efficiency: recall per mean second of study time is higher in the timed than the untimed condition for all age groups — related
- Study time allocation becomes more strategic with age: older learners allocate relatively more time to difficult items, and the easy-difficult allocation gap is larger in the untimed condition — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
study-efficiency-increases-with-age |
title |
Learning efficiency increases with age, with adults and 14-year-olds more efficient than 10-year-olds, and no age-by-condition interaction |
description |
Learning efficiency increases with age, with adults and 14-year-olds more efficient than 10-year-olds, and no age-by-condition interaction |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2021 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — gönül-2021 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.