Claims

Free recall of expository text is higher under a study goal than under an entertainment goal

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2001 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Readers with a study goal recalled more text clauses than readers with an entertainment goal, remembering about 20% more statements. → P. van den Broek 2001

Evidence

P. van den Broek 2001

P. van den Broek, R. F. Lorch, Jr., T. Linderholm, & M. Gustafson. (2001). The effects of readers' goals on inference generation and memory for texts. Memory & Cognition, 29(8), 1081-1087. https://link.springer.com/journal/13414

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Free-recall ANOVA (factors: instructional condition, text, text version) after a written mathematics distractor task. "Recall was higher in the study condition ( M = 18.20 clauses) than in the entertainment condition (M = 15.08 clauses)"; the discussion states study-goal readers remembered 20% more statements.

"As predicted, recall was higher in the study condition( M = 18.20 clauses) than in the enter-tainment condition (M = 15.08 clauses) [F(1,65) = 4.22,MSe = 37.99]."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id study-goal-better-free-recall
title Free recall of expository text is higher under a study goal than under an entertainment goal
description Free recall of expository text is higher under a study goal than under an entertainment goal
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2001
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — p-van-den-broek-2001

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.