Fall-to-fall retention was significantly higher for the 2015 Summer Bridge cohort than for controls¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? The fall-to-fall retention rate for cohort 2015 was significantly higher than the control group's rate. → Gonzalez Quiroz 2018

Evidence¶

Gonzalez Quiroz 2018¶

Gonzalez Quiroz, A., & Garza, N. R. (2018). Focus on Student Success: Components for Effective Summer Bridge Programs. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 17(2), 101-111. https://doi.org/10.1177/1538192717753988

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Analysis of retention, defined as continued enrollment from fall of first year to fall of second year, for the 2015 intervention cohort versus its control group. Table 3 prints retention rates of 85.49% (FOSS) versus 69.35% (control), an effect size of 16.14 marked ** (p < .01).

"The fall-to-fall retention rate for cohort 2015 was also found to be significantly higher (Table 3)."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Summer Bridge participants in cohorts 2014 and 2015 had significantly higher gatekeeper pass rates, semester GPA, and earned credit hours than controls — related
• In one NVCC summer bridge cohort, 100 percent of students continued to the next semester, described as much higher than normal retention rates — related
• Prior studies reviewed report that summer bridge participants persist to the second year and earn higher GPAs than non-participants — a broader claim this one bears on
• Summer Bridge participants at a Hispanic-serving community college outperformed non-participants in gatekeeper course pass rates, with gains growing across cohorts — related