Claims

Prior studies reviewed report that summer bridge participants persist to the second year and earn higher GPAs than non-participants

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Studies the authors review found bridge participants more likely to persist to the second year with higher GPAs, and several reported significantly higher retention, persistence, and graduation rates. → Gonzalez Quiroz 2018

Evidence

Gonzalez Quiroz 2018

Gonzalez Quiroz, A., & Garza, N. R. (2018). Focus on Student Success: Components for Effective Summer Bridge Programs. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 17(2), 101-111. https://doi.org/10.1177/1538192717753988

q2 · i? · design · r3

Narrative literature review attributing this finding to Pascarella and Terenzini (2005) and Walpole et al. (2008); the review also cites Cabrera et al. (2013) reporting retention (p < .05) and persistence (p < .001) significantly higher for participants, and Douglas and Attewell (2014) reporting higher graduation and second-year retention for bridge students in a cohort of more than 10,000.

"Both studies found that summer bridge participants were more likely to persist to the second year and had a higher grade point average (GPA) than those who did not participate in a summer bridge program."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.