Claims

Twenty-one of 30 deaf students correctly marked where the Sun rises and sets after observation-based activities

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · checked against its sources 2026-11-03 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? On the final post-test drawing question about sunrise and sunset in Samsun on 21st June, 21 students drew correct and 9 incorrect answers. → Bolat 2016

Evidence

Bolat 2016

Bolat, M. (2016). The Development and Implementation of a Model for Teaching Astronomy to Deaf Students. Journal of Education and Training Studies. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i7.1506

q2 · i? · design · r2

Post-test drawing question in the single-group study of 30 deaf students; Table 10 reports 21 correct and 9 incorrect drawings. The authors state students are more successful in astronomy subjects based on observations that they learn by doing themselves.

"the fact that 21 out of 30 students answered this question correctly shows that the activities of the project were useful."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.