Claims

Deaf students held alternative conceptions about seasons, attributing them to the Moon's shadow and clouds

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q1
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2021: baselines and conditions change

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? Students explained the formation of seasons as the shadow of the Moon and clouds preventing the Sun's rays, and believed the Sun passes just above their heads at midday. → Bolat 2016

Evidence

Bolat 2016

Bolat, M. (2016). The Development and Implementation of a Model for Teaching Astronomy to Deaf Students. Journal of Education and Training Studies. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i7.1506

q1 · i? · design · r2

Interview findings with students S7, S12 and S20 across three observation dates; the article reports these as students' initial mental models, since students had received no schooling about seasons. The authors note these align with Roald & Mikalsen (2001) and other literature.

"the students in our study explained the formation of seasons as “ the shadow of the Moon ” and “ the clouds preventing the rays of the Sun ”."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.