Claims

Supervised surgery studies on actual patients were all observational, reported high surgical volumes, and showed higher complication rates than VRS studies

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? All three supervised surgery studies were observational and reported a high amount of cataract surgeries performed by trainees, with intraoperative complication rates higher than in VRS studies. → Dormegny Lea 2024

Evidence

Dormegny Lea 2024

Dormegny Lea, Lansingh Van Charles, Lejay Anne, Chakfe Nabil, Yaici Rémi, Sauer Arnaud, Gaucher David, Henderson Bonnie An, Thomsen Ann Sofia Skou, Bourcier Tristan. (2024). Virtual reality simulation and real-life training programs for cataract surgery: a scoping review of the literature. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06245-w

q2 · i? · review · r2

Review-level characterization of the four supervised training studies: all three comparative-relevant supervised studies were observational, reported high surgical volumes (median surgical ratio 167 [58-1034]), and intraoperative complication rates appeared higher than in VRS studies.

"All three supervised surgery studies were observational and reported a high amount of cataract surgeries performed by trainees. However, intraoperative complication rates appeared to be higher than in virtual reality simulation studies."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.