Claims

Significant patient-safety improvements were found in 80% of comparative virtual reality simulation studies for cataract surgery training

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Most comparative VRS studies reported significant patient safety improvements in the operating room. → Dormegny Lea 2024

Evidence

Dormegny Lea 2024

Dormegny Lea, Lansingh Van Charles, Lejay Anne, Chakfe Nabil, Yaici Rémi, Sauer Arnaud, Gaucher David, Henderson Bonnie An, Thomsen Ann Sofia Skou, Bourcier Tristan. (2024). Virtual reality simulation and real-life training programs for cataract surgery: a scoping review of the literature. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06245-w

q2 · i? · review · r2

Review-level synthesis of the 18 included studies: 17 (94%) proposed patient safety assessments, mainly intraoperative complication reports (67%), and "Significant safety improvements were found in 80% of comparative virtual reality simulation studies." No effect sizes pooled.

"There were 17 studies (94%) proposing patient safety assessments, mainly through intraoperative complication reports (67%). Significant safety improvements were found in 80% of comparative virtual reality simulation studies."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.