Claims

Supporting the learning process includes supporting student teamwork, shared learning, and student self-efficacy through standing back and enabling student-led learning

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · checked against its sources 2026-10-31 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The second synthesized finding comprises mentors' competencies in supporting students to work as a team, supporting shared learning among students, and supporting students' and teams' self-efficacy by standing back and encouraging autonomy. → Juntunen 2025

Evidence

Juntunen 2025

Juntunen, J., Tuomikoski, A.‐M., Pramila‐Savukoski, S., Kaarlela, V., Keinänen, A.‐L., Kääriäinen, M., & Mikkonen, K. (2025). Healthcare professionals' experiences of required competencies in mentoring of interprofessional students in clinical practice: A systematic review of qualitative studies. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 81, 701–729. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.16347

q2 · i? · review · r2

Within the second synthesized finding, mentors described supporting self-efficacy: "Self‐efficacy requires student‐led learning, where the role of the mentor is seen more as a guide, role model or helper rather than a teacher."

"Self‐efficacy requires student‐led learning, where the role of the mentor is seen more as a guide, role model or helper rather than a teacher (Dyar et al., 2019)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.