Claims

A supportive adult acting as resilience teacher was beneficial for building resiliency skills among at-risk students

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The researcher's role as resilience teacher, guide, mentor and facilitator was established to be beneficial for building resiliency skills. → Muhammad Irfan Arif and Munawar S. Mirza 2017

Evidence

Muhammad Irfan Arif and Munawar S. Mirza 2017

Muhammad Irfan Arif and Munawar S. Mirza. (2017). Effectiveness of an Intervention Program in Fostering Academic Resilience of Students at Risk of Failure at Secondary School Level. Bulletin of Education and Research, 39(1), 251-264. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1210192

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Authors' interpretation from the discussion of the 64-student intervention experiment: the resilience teacher developed a positive relationship with students and fostered resilience through a positive motivational and inspiring attitude. This is the authors' interpretive claim, not a separately tested comparison.

"The role of researcher as a resilience teacher, as a guide, as a mentor and as a facilitator was established to be beneficial for the successful build -up of resiliency skills among at -risk students."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.