Claims

A three-month teacher-delivered resiliency module significantly increased overall academic resilience of non-resilient at-risk secondary students compared with traditional instruction

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2017 · checked against its sources 2026-11-02 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Non-resilient at-risk students receiving the intervention training performed better on overall resilience than those not receiving it. → Muhammad Irfan Arif and Munawar S. Mirza 2017

Evidence

Muhammad Irfan Arif and Munawar S. Mirza 2017

Muhammad Irfan Arif and Munawar S. Mirza. (2017). Effectiveness of an Intervention Program in Fostering Academic Resilience of Students at Risk of Failure at Secondary School Level. Bulletin of Education and Research, 39(1), 251-264. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1210192

q3 · i? · causal · r1

Pretest-posttest control group experiment with 64 non-resilient at-risk students (32 per group) in a public secondary school for boys in District Lahore; t-test on gain scores after three months of treatment. The experimental group's overall mean gain was 72.89 versus 12.06 for controls, with t = 166.62, df = 62, p = .001 — "a significant difference between the mean gain scores".

"Table 5 indicates a significant difference between the mean gain scores of control and experimental groups’ students on resilience."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.