Claims

Surface-feature similarity of passage pairs does not affect self-derivation performance or patterns of episode-detail endorsement

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r2 · q3 · i0–i2
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i2 A MANOVA found no difference in self-derivation or stem-fact performance between high and low surface-similarity conditions (η² = .06). → Bauer 2020 q3 i0 Endorsement patterns for old, new, and hybrid statements did not differ by surface similarity (η² < .001). → Bauer 2020 (2)

Evidence

Bauer 2020

Bauer, P. J., Esposito, A. G., & Daly, J. J. (2020). Self-derivation through memory integration: A model for accumulation of semantic knowledge. Learning and Instruction. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101271

q3 · i2 · causal · r2

Between-subjects manipulation in Experiment 2: 43 children heard passage pairs with the same main character (high similarity) and 60 with different characters (low similarity). "A MANOVA examining differences in self-derivation and stem fact performance revealed no difference" across conditions (F(92) = 1.30, p = .28, η² = .06).

"A MANOVA examining differences in self-derivation and stem fact performance revealed no difference in open-ended or forced-choice performance across the similarity conditions, F(92) = 1.30, p = .28, η2 = .06."

Bauer 2020 (2)

Bauer, P. J., Esposito, A. G., & Daly, J. J. (2020). Self-derivation through memory integration: A model for accumulation of semantic knowledge. Learning and Instruction. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101271

q3 · i0 · causal · r2

The 2 (surface similarity) × 3 (statement type) mixed ANOVA on Session 2 endorsement found no similarity effect: "patterns of endorsement did not differ as a function of whether the members of the stem-fact passage pairs had the same or different main characters" (Fs < 0.05, ps > .83, η² < .001).

"Contrary to predictions, patterns of endorsement did not differ as a function of whether the members of the stem-fact passage pairs had the same or different main characters (Fs < 0.05, ps > .83, η2 < .001)."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id surface-similarity-no-effect-integration
title Surface-feature similarity of passage pairs does not affect self-derivation performance or patterns of episode-detail endorsement
description Surface-feature similarity of passage pairs does not affect self-derivation performance or patterns of episode-detail endorsement
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2020
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-23
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — bauer-2020, bauer-2020-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.