Surface-feature similarity of passage pairs does not affect self-derivation performance or patterns of episode-detail endorsement¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr2·q3·i0–i2
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i2 A MANOVA found no difference in self-derivation or stem-fact performance between high and low surface-similarity conditions (η² = .06). → Bauer 2020
q3 i0 Endorsement patterns for old, new, and hybrid statements did not differ by surface similarity (η² < .001). → Bauer 2020 (2)
Evidence¶
Bauer 2020¶
Bauer, P. J., Esposito, A. G., & Daly, J. J. (2020). Self-derivation through memory integration: A model for accumulation of semantic knowledge. Learning and Instruction. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101271
q3 · i2 · causal · r2
Between-subjects manipulation in Experiment 2: 43 children heard passage pairs with the same main character (high similarity) and 60 with different characters (low similarity). "A MANOVA examining differences in self-derivation and stem fact performance revealed no difference" across conditions (F(92) = 1.30, p = .28, η² = .06).
"A MANOVA examining differences in self-derivation and stem fact performance revealed no difference in open-ended or forced-choice performance across the similarity conditions, F(92) = 1.30, p = .28, η2 = .06."
Bauer 2020 (2)¶
Bauer, P. J., Esposito, A. G., & Daly, J. J. (2020). Self-derivation through memory integration: A model for accumulation of semantic knowledge. Learning and Instruction. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101271
q3 · i0 · causal · r2
The 2 (surface similarity) × 3 (statement type) mixed ANOVA on Session 2 endorsement found no similarity effect: "patterns of endorsement did not differ as a function of whether the members of the stem-fact passage pairs had the same or different main characters" (Fs < 0.05, ps > .83, η² < .001).
"Contrary to predictions, patterns of endorsement did not differ as a function of whether the members of the stem-fact passage pairs had the same or different main characters (Fs < 0.05, ps > .83, η2 < .001)."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Long-Term Memory — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- Children preserve boundaries of separate learning episodes: hybrid statements combining content from two passages are rejected below chance — related
- Second-grade children self-derive new factual knowledge through integration of separate yet related learning episodes in classroom settings — a broader claim this one bears on
- Self-derivation through memory integration extends to science curriculum content, with open-ended performance comparable to general-knowledge stimuli — related
- Self-derivation performance is positively correlated with stem-fact memory and predicts retention of self-derived knowledge one week later — related
- Cluster membership showed a strong multivariate effect on standard text-similarity metrics (Pillai's trace = 0.85, F(12, 248) = 15.31, p < 0.001) — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
surface-similarity-no-effect-integration |
title |
Surface-feature similarity of passage pairs does not affect self-derivation performance or patterns of episode-detail endorsement |
description |
Surface-feature similarity of passage pairs does not affect self-derivation performance or patterns of episode-detail endorsement |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2020 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-23 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — bauer-2020, bauer-2020-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.