Claims

Post-course survey respondents reported the most growth on rethinking ideas about disability, with 27 of 33 noting definite growth and 17 describing a shift away from deficit thinking

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In the post-course survey, the outcome with the most reported growth was rethinking ideas about disability: 27 participants noted definite growth, none noted no growth, and 17 reported shifting away from deficit thinking. → Rachel Lambert 2026

Evidence

Rachel Lambert 2026

Rachel Lambert, Kara Imm. (2026). Teachers rehumanizing mathematics for students with disabilities; the role of empathy. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-025-09753-4

q2 · i? · qualitative · r2

Post-course Qualtrics survey completed by 33 of the 45 course participants, rated on a none/some/definite growth scale with open-ended questions coded qualitatively. Participants described shifts "from a medical model towards a social model, in the context of their own past deficit thinking, and related to the larger political struggle of disabled people."

"the course outcome that participants reported the most growth on was “we rethink our ideas about disability” with 27 participants noting “definite growth,” and none “no growth.” Seventeen participants noted that they had shifted away from deficit thinking because of the course."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id survey-definite-growth-rethinking-disability
title Post-course survey respondents reported the most growth on rethinking ideas about disability, with 27 of 33 noting definite growth and 17 describing a shift away from deficit thinking
description Post-course survey respondents reported the most growth on rethinking ideas about disability, with 27 of 33 noting definite growth and 17 describing a shift away from deficit thinking
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2026
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — rachel-lambert-2026

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.