The experimental group rated AVDS usability as excellent while the control group rated it as good¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · checked against its sources 2026-10-28 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The mean SUS score of the experimental group was 79.17 (Excellent) while the control group scored 69.23 (Good). → Kogan 2024
Evidence¶
Kogan 2024¶
Kogan, G., Chassidim, H., & Rabaev, I. (2024). The efficacy of animation and visualization in teaching data structures: a case study. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-024-10382-w
q2 · i? · causal · r2
SUS percentile ranks converted to adjective ratings for both groups (n=78 total); the article suggests AVDS was perceived as more usable by the experimental than the control group.
"The mean score of the experimental group was 79.17, which is con- sidered "Excellent," while the control group had a score of 69.23, which is considered "Good.""
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Students using the AVDS tool scored higher on an AVL-tree performance test than controls — related
- Experimental-group participants rated TibetCPR highly usable (SUS = 84.3, an Excellent rating), with the highest items on voluntary engagement and independent use — related
- The system receives a good average usability rating (SUS 69.7, grade B) but with wide individual variation, which the authors take to suggest UI consistency issues — related
- Special-education practitioners rated AdaptED Stories as strongly usable, with a mean SUS score of 86.8 corresponding to an A grade — related
- After design adjustments, the LAD achieved good–excellent usability (SUS M = 4.13, equal to 78.25%) — related
- The FACTRIA-aware chatbot received good usability ratings (SUS 70.84) and high usefulness ratings from most of the 11 stakeholders — related
- Adults rated the LLM-powered iCub storytelling system as usable, with a total SUS score of 76.70 indicating good product usability — related
- Older adults rated the KOKU digital programme with excellent usability and high acceptability — related
- The Bloom classification UI shows low perceived workload and high usability in a 50-participant user study — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
sus-usability-excellent-experimental-good-control |
title |
The experimental group rated AVDS usability as excellent while the control group rated it as good |
description |
The experimental group rated AVDS usability as excellent while the control group rated it as good |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2024 |
source_checked |
2026-10-28 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-28 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — kogan-2024 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.