Experimental-group participants rated TibetCPR highly usable (SUS = 84.3, an Excellent rating), with the highest items on voluntary engagement and independent use¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2026 · checked against its sources 2026-10-24 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2029: tool and model accuracy changes quickly

Subclaims¶

q3 i? The 20 experimental-group participants gave an overall SUS score of 84.3 on the 0–100 scale, corresponding to an Excellent adjective rating. → Yibo Meng 2026

Evidence¶

Yibo Meng 2026¶

Yibo Meng, Ruiqi Chen, Zhiming Liu, and Xiaolan Ding. (2026). TibetCPR: A Multimodal Tactile Feedback System to Enhance Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Training in High-Altitude Regions of Tibet. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.07765 doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.07765

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Descriptive usability assessment using the System Usability Scale administered to the 20 experimental-group participants after the post-test. Item-level means clustered between 4.25 and 4.55 on the 1–5 scale; the score is descriptive, with no effect size reported.

"Computed via the standard SUS scoring procedure, the overall score was𝑀SUS = 84.3(on the 0–100 SUS scale), corresponding to anExcellentrating on Bangor et al. 's adjective scale."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Special-education practitioners rated AdaptED Stories as strongly usable, with a mean SUS score of 86.8 corresponding to an A grade — related
• Older adults rated the KOKU digital programme with excellent usability and high acceptability — related
• In a randomised study with 40 CPR-naive lay adults in Tibet, 10 minutes of TibetCPR training produced rhythm-stabilisation gains that substantially exceeded unguided practice and transferred to an unscaffolded post-test — related
• Students rated AISSA's usability as excellent, with an average SUS score of 83.38 from 30 of 46 pilot students — related
• Students rated Zoo U highly for engagement and likeability, with every usability area rated at least 3.8 on a four-point scale — related
• The FACTRIA-aware chatbot received good usability ratings (SUS 70.84) and high usefulness ratings from most of the 11 stakeholders — related
• After design adjustments, the LAD achieved good–excellent usability (SUS M = 4.13, equal to 78.25%) — related
• Adults rated the LLM-powered iCub storytelling system as usable, with a total SUS score of 76.70 indicating good product usability — related
• The Bloom classification UI shows low perceived workload and high usability in a 50-participant user study — related
• The system receives a good average usability rating (SUS 69.7, grade B) but with wide individual variation, which the authors take to suggest UI consistency issues — related