Claims

Words learned indirectly under Synectics instruction are predominantly negative in connotation in both experimental groups

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Negative-connotation words had the highest percentage in both experimental groups (44.0% in the first, 46.8% in the second). → Bahadır ERİŞTİ – Mustafa POLAT 2017

Evidence

Bahadır ERİŞTİ – Mustafa POLAT 2017

Bahadır ERİŞTİ – Mustafa POLAT. (2017). THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SYNECTICS INSTRUCTIONAL MODEL ON FOREIGN LANGUAGE VOCABULARY TEACHING. International Journal of Languages’ Education and Teaching, Volume 5, Issue 2. https://doi.org/10.18298/ijlet.1753

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Categorization of indirectly learned words as negative, positive or neutral by English subject experts. In the second experimental group, 10 words were neutral, 22 negative and 15 positive; the article reports negative words had the highest percentage in both groups.

"Seventeen of the words students learned indirectly in the teaching process in the first experimental group have neutral connotation; 22 of them have negative connotations, and 11 of them have positive connotations."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.