Claims

Synectics-based teaching leads students to learn far more words indirectly during the process, with significantly higher learning levels of those words

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i3 Experimental groups learned about five times more words indirectly (50 and 47 vs 13 and 11) and scored significantly higher on those words (t=9.69, p<.00, d=2.08). → Bahadır ERİŞTİ – Mustafa POLAT 2017

Evidence

Bahadır ERİŞTİ – Mustafa POLAT 2017

Bahadır ERİŞTİ – Mustafa POLAT. (2017). THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SYNECTICS INSTRUCTIONAL MODEL ON FOREIGN LANGUAGE VOCABULARY TEACHING. International Journal of Languages’ Education and Teaching, Volume 5, Issue 2. https://doi.org/10.18298/ijlet.1753

q3 · i3 · causal · r1

Counts of indirectly learned words collected via the third part of the achievement test in each of the four groups. A second evidence basis is the posttest mean percentage of 88.28 vs 66.38 (t=9.69, p<.00, d=2.08); the article states experimental students "learned about five times more words".

"the number of learned words indirectly during the process is 50 in the first experimental group, 47 in the second experimental group, 1 3 in the first control group and 11 in the second control group."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.