Claims

System compensation as implemented is not a satisfactory adaptive variable

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 1972 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? System compensation, as implemented for this experiment, did not perform satisfactorily as an adaptive variable. → Norman 1972

Evidence

Norman 1972

Norman, D. A.; And Others. (1972). Adaptive Training of Manual Control: 1. Comparison of Three Adaptive Variables and Two Logic Schemes. Life Sciences, Inc. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED059585 doi:10.1037/e426822004-001

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Experimental finding from the comparison of three adaptive variables. The report concludes that "System compensation, as implemented for this experiment, is not a satisfactory adaptive variable" and that neither are aiding and quickening.

"System compensation, as implemented for this experiment, is not a satisfactory adaptive variable. Nor are aiding and quickening."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id system-compensation-unsatisfactory-adaptive-variable
title System compensation as implemented is not a satisfactory adaptive variable
description System compensation as implemented is not a satisfactory adaptive variable
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 1972
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-27
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — norman-1972

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.