Gain-effective time constant product is slightly superior to forcing function amplitude as an adaptive variable¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 1972 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Gain-effective time constant product outperformed forcing function amplitude as an adaptive variable for trainee performance. → Norman 1972

Evidence¶

Norman 1972¶

Norman, D. A.; And Others. (1972). Adaptive Training of Manual Control: 1. Comparison of Three Adaptive Variables and Two Logic Schemes. Life Sciences, Inc. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED059585 doi:10.1037/e426822004-001

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Comparison of adaptive variables across experimental training groups in a transfer-of-training paradigm. The report states "Gain-effective time constant product is slightly superior to forcing function amplitude as an adaptive variable."

"Gain-effective time constant product is slightly superior to forcing function amplitude as an adaptive variable."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Manual adaptation is slightly superior to automatic adaptation in adaptive training of manual control — related
• K-12 educators value product-improvement research more, and individual-adaptation research less, than higher education educators — related
• Transfer task performance is the critical measure of what adaptive training accomplishes — related
• System compensation as implemented is not a satisfactory adaptive variable — related