Designers and providers assess recipient engagement in training and TA through attendance, active participation, progress between check-ins, and satisfaction survey data and response rates¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitativer1·q2
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Recipient engagement in training and TA is assessed through multiple means, including attendance, active participation, progress between check-ins, and satisfaction survey data and response rates. → Kara Conroy 2021
Evidence¶
Kara Conroy 2021¶
Kara Conroy, Annalisa Mastri, James Wholley. (2021). Engaging Training and Technical Assistance Recipients: Lessons from the Field. Mathematica. https://www.mathematica.org/publications/engaging-training-and-technical-assistance-recipients-lessons-from-the-field
q2 · i? · qualitative · r1
Descriptive finding from the brief's interviews with 12 TA designers, providers, and recipients about current practice. It enumerates the assessment means used, including "attendance, active participation, progress made between technical assistance check-ins, and satisfaction survey data and response rates."
"Designers and providers assess recipients’ engagement in training and technical assistance through various means, including attendance, active participation, progress made between technical assistance check-ins, and satisfaction survey data and response rates."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Training and technical assistance is most engaging when it is grounded in clear expectations, designed around recipient needs, developed with ongoing recipient input, accessible, delivered by equipped providers, and framed as a partnership — related
- Participants reported a strong level of agreement and high satisfaction with ideation discussion activities in Design Thinking — related
- Students with learning disabilities reported high satisfaction with learning vocabulary through concept diagrams — related
- Students in a deliberate practice group reported satisfaction with the learning process on a survey given only to that group — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
ta-engagement-measurement-methods |
title |
Designers and providers assess recipient engagement in training and TA through attendance, active participation, progress between check-ins, and satisfaction survey data and response rates |
description |
Designers and providers assess recipient engagement in training and TA through attendance, active participation, progress between check-ins, and satisfaction survey data and response rates |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2021 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — kara-conroy-2021 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.