Among TAM constructs, result demonstrability, intention to use, and ease of use received the highest ratings while output quality was lowest¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2021 · checked against its sources 2026-10-08 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? In the survey of 17 ESL students, Result Demonstrability (5.84/7) and Intention to Use (5.78/7) scored higher than Output Quality (4.10/7) and Academic Relevance (4.16/7). → Johnson 2021

Evidence¶

Johnson 2021¶

Johnson, C., & Cardoso, W. (2021). Speaking to write: examining language learners’ acceptance of automatic speech recognition as a writing tool. In N. Zoghlami et al. (Eds), CALL and professionalisation: short papers from EUROCALL 2021 (pp. 167-171). Research-publishing.net. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2021.54.1327

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Descriptive statistics from the TAM-informed survey (Table 1) report means out of 7 with SDs and Cronbach's alphas: Perceived Usefulness 4.71, Result Demonstrability 5.84, Perceived Ease of Use 5.25, Intention to Use 5.78, Output Quality 4.10. No inferential comparisons were reported.

"Table 1. Descriptive statistics of survey results: main categories TAM Constructs Mean/7 SD Perceived Usefulness (α =.82) 4.71 1.69"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Through Chapelle's CALL evaluation criteria, participants experienced ASR writing as useful, authentic, meaning-focused, and matched to their proficiency level — related
• Adult ESL learners report above-neutral perceptions of ASR as a writing tool on usefulness, ease of use, and intention to use — a broader claim this one bears on
• Assignment support was the highest-rated Class Companion function (83% Effective/Very Effective, M = 3.38), while assessing knowledge and skills was the lowest (71%)