Task condition (decision-making vs. opinion-exchange) did not significantly moderate negotiation strategy use¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Differences in negotiation strategy use between unfocused and focused tasks were not significantly affected by the decision-making vs. opinion-exchange condition. → Roohani 2022

Evidence¶

Roohani 2022¶

Roohani, A., & Esmaeili, M. (2022). Effect of (Un)Focused Tasks on L2 Learners' Meaning Negotiation and Negotiation Strategy. PASAA, 63. https://portal.issn.org/resource/ISSN/2287-0024 doi:10.58837/chula.pasaa.63.1.12

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Second Chi-square analysis on strategy frequencies split by the four task conditions (UF/DM, F/DM, UF/OE, F/OE) from the same counterbalanced study; descriptively, UF/DM elicited more confirmation checks (63.63%) than F/DM (38.9%); no effect size printed.

"the Chi -square results indicated that the task condition (decision -making vs. opinion -exchange) did not act as a moderating variable and the above differences between the unfocused and focus ed tasks in the use of negotiation strategies were not significantly affected by the task conditions of decision-making and information-exchange, χ2 (2, 44) = 0.237, p = .888"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Task condition (decision-making vs. opinion-exchange) did not significantly moderate the amount of meaning negotiation — related
• Unfocused tasks elicit significantly more confirmation checks and clarification requests than focused tasks — related
• Unfocused communicative tasks elicit significantly more meaning negotiation than focused tasks among intermediate EFL learners — related