Task condition (decision-making vs. opinion-exchange) did not significantly moderate the amount of meaning negotiation¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Differences in meaning negotiation frequency were not significantly affected by the decision-making vs. opinion-exchange task condition. → Roohani 2022

Evidence¶

Roohani 2022¶

Roohani, A., & Esmaeili, M. (2022). Effect of (Un)Focused Tasks on L2 Learners' Meaning Negotiation and Negotiation Strategy. PASAA, 63. https://portal.issn.org/resource/ISSN/2287-0024 doi:10.58837/chula.pasaa.63.1.12

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Chi-square analysis of negotiation frequencies across the same 36-learner counterbalanced task performance; the article reports the DM tasks descriptively yielded more negotiation cases than OE tasks, but concludes the task condition "did not act as a moderating variable"; no effect size printed.

"the Chi -square results also showed that the observed frequency differences between the DM and OE tasks were statistically significant (χ2 = 0.06, p = .805). Therefore, the differences were not affected significantly by the task condition of decision -making vs. opinion- exchange"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Time (two years) shows no significant effect on children's overall amount of meaning negotiation — related
• Task condition (decision-making vs. opinion-exchange) did not significantly moderate negotiation strategy use — related
• Unfocused communicative tasks elicit significantly more meaning negotiation than focused tasks among intermediate EFL learners — related
• Unfocused tasks elicit significantly more confirmation checks and clarification requests than focused tasks — related
• Native-speaker conversations with learners show more interactional modification than native-speaker conversations in two-way information-exchange tasks, but not in tasks without information exchange — related
• Task topic (science vs debate) showed no statistically significant effect on conversation informativeness — related