Claims

TBL is associated with improved teamwork measures, including higher team emotional intelligence after clerkship and improved perceived value of team work

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · review r2–r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Two studies using the WEIP-S found team emotional intelligence was higher post-clerkship than pre-clerkship, with significantly higher gains in emotion awareness and management when controls were included. → Sterpu Irene 2024 q2 i? Studies of the value of teams showed significant improvements in perceived value of group work, with one mixed result for value of working with peers. → Sterpu Irene 2024 (2)

Evidence

Sterpu Irene 2024

Sterpu Irene, Herling Lotta, Nordquist Jonas, Rotgans Jerome, Acharya Ganesh. (2024). Team-based learning (TBL) in clinical disciplines for undergraduate medical students—a scoping review. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04975-x

q2 · i? · review · r2

The review's teamwork-outcome synthesis covers two studies using the Workgroup Emotional Intelligence Profile; when control groups were included, TBL produced significantly higher gains in awareness of one's own emotions, recognizing emotions in others, and managing others' emotions. No effect sizes are printed.

"Both studies found that team emotional intelligence was higher post-clerkship compared to pre-clerkship [60, 63]."

Sterpu Irene 2024 (2)

Sterpu Irene, Herling Lotta, Nordquist Jonas, Rotgans Jerome, Acharya Ganesh. (2024). Team-based learning (TBL) in clinical disciplines for undergraduate medical students—a scoping review. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04975-x

q2 · i? · review · r3

The review reports Levine et al.'s use of the Classroom Engagement Survey and the 17-point Value of Teams instrument against historical cohorts; Warrier et al. found no significant pre-post difference in value of working with peers but a significant difference in value of group work.

"Their results showed that those who participated in TBL sessions showed significant improvement in the “value of working with peers” and “value of group work” compared to historical cohorts from previous years."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.