Claims

In Chinese neurology education, TBL alone or combined with other methods is associated with improved self-study ability, communication skills, and teamwork ability versus LBL

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2026 · checked against its sources 2026-10-31 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i3 In RCTs of neurology education in mainland China, TBL alone or combined with other teaching methods was associated with higher self-study ability (SMD = 1.15, 3 studies), communication skills (SMD = 2.36, 4 studies), and teamwork ability (SMD = 0.97, 3 studies) than LBL. → Fu Jie 2026

Evidence

Fu Jie 2026

Fu Jie, Chen Xiu, Li Jinglun, Peng Lilei. (2026). TBL alone or combined with other teaching methods for neurology education in China: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-09468-1

q3 · i3 · quant-synthesis · r2

Meta-analysis of 16 RCTs (1,267 students, interns and residents) in neurology education in mainland China, comparing TBL alone (9 studies) or TBL combined with other teaching methods (7 studies) with lecture-based learning. These are secondary outcomes from small sets of the RCTs: self-study ability from 3 studies (SMD = 1.15), communication skills from 4 studies (SMD = 2.36), and teamwork ability from 3 studies (SMD = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.68 to 1.26, p < 0.00001). The authors note the included studies' low methodological quality (none reported allocation concealment) and that results from mainland China may not generalise elsewhere.

"For self-study ability, 3 studies were included in the meta-analysis, and the pooled SMD was 1.15 (95% CI: 0.69 to 1.61, p < 0.00001). For communication skills, 4 studies were included, and the meta-analysis yielded a SMD of 2.36 (95% CI: 0.74 to 3.98, p = 0.004)."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.